Nova Press / Jeff Kolby (Udemy)
Nova's LSAT Prep Course (Udemy) Review — Honest Analysis of 25 Student Opinions
Nova's LSAT Prep Course on Udemy is a genuinely affordable entry point into structured LSAT preparation — 403 lectures built on a proven 25-year-old Nova Press curriculum, rated 4.0/5 from 89 student ratings, available for roughly $12-20 with lifetime access. At that price it is easy to recommend as a supplementary logic-instruction layer for learners rebuilding their reasoning fundamentals. The significant reservation that tempers the verdict is format currency: Logic Games were permanently removed from the LSAT in August 2024, and the course was built around a three-section exam that no longer exists. Learners sitting the current exam (two Logical Reasoning sections plus Reading Comprehension) need to verify exactly which portions of this curriculum still apply and which are now out of scope. Paired with free official LSAC practice on LawHub and Khan Academy, this course can serve a budget-conscious test-taker well — treated as a standalone one-stop LSAT programme, it is incomplete for the exam as it stands today.
Final score
from 25 analysed opinions
Published AI-researched, editor-audited
Distribution of opinions
Per-criterion scores
The course delivers 403 lectures across 8.5 hours, working through fundamental logic principles — contrapositives, if-then chains, pivotal words — drawn from Nova Press's 560-page Master The LSAT book. Amazon reviews of the underlying book highlight thorough coverage of analytical reasoning and a clear step-by-step breakdown of argument structure. The critical content issue that every independent reviewer and community discussion now flags is currency: Logic Games (the Analytical Reasoning section) were permanently removed from the LSAT beginning August 2024, and any course built substantially around that section is teaching material no longer on the test. The Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension coverage is more durable, but the absence of an explicit update addressing the format change is a real gap.
Jeff Kolby of Nova Press carries genuine credentials — 20+ years in test preparation, millions of students reached through Nova's print materials, and a bestselling Amazon ranking for the Master The LSAT book. Amazon book reviewers describe the Nova approach as highly analytical and structured, with solid foundations for argument deconstruction. The honest deduction is that Kolby is primarily known as a publisher and author rather than an on-screen LSAT video instructor, and with only 187 Udemy enrolments the teaching format has had limited real-world stress-testing relative to competitors like 7Sage or Blueprint. Community discussions on Reddit do not mention him by name in the way that Blueprint or LSAT Demon instructors are cited.
This is where the course is hardest to argue against. At a typical sale price of $12-20 with lifetime access, it provides the equivalent of a two-month course framework for roughly the cost of a textbook — compared to $699-$1,899 for Blueprint, Princeton Review, or Kaplan. The onlinecoursespro.com review gives it 4.2/5 overall and cites the 30-day money-back guarantee, free course updates, and iOS/Android access as genuine extras at the price. The honest caveat is that the low price also reflects a small enrolled community (187 students) and a curriculum that has not been explicitly updated for the post-August 2024 LSAT format, which is a meaningful real cost in wasted study time if you are sitting the current exam.
The course is built around teaching logic principles through the Nova Press curriculum, not around supplying high-volume practice. There are no embedded full-length LSAT practice tests and no original question bank; Reddit's r/LSAT community consistently warns that effective LSAT prep requires drilling with official LSAC questions from LawHub, and no Udemy course can replicate that. Independent community reviewers note that the most cost-effective practice resource is free — Khan Academy's official LSAC-partnered prep — which raises the bar for what a paid course must add. The practice-materials gap here is the widest of the five criteria.
Nova Press's own marketing claims "your score will improve significantly" if you master the course material, and Amazon reviews of the underlying book include anecdotes of successful law school admission after following the study plan. Community opinion gathered from LSAT forums and Reddit threads is more measured: structured prep courses are broadly credited with 10-15 point improvements versus unguided self-study, but reviewers consistently note those gains require pairing any video course with heavy LawHub official practice. At a competitive level, LSAT Demon, 7Sage, and Blueprint are the platforms cited when score improvement is the primary goal.
What learners said
What people loved
5- Exceptional value — typically $12-20 at sale with lifetime access versus $699-$1,899 for major prep companies like Blueprint, Kaplan, or Princeton Review×14
- Rigorous, analytical curriculum built on Nova Press's bestselling 560-page Master The LSAT book with 20+ years of development×11
- Self-paced structure with 403 lectures allows learners to drill specific weak spots in logical reasoning and argument analysis×9
- Full course updates included at no charge and 30-day money-back guarantee reduce purchase risk×7
- Teaches durable logic fundamentals — contrapositive, if-then chains, pivotal words — that remain relevant across the post-2024 LSAT sections×8
What frustrated learners
4- Course was built around the old three-section LSAT that included Logic Games, which were permanently removed in August 2024 — currency is a real concern×13
- No full-length official LSAT practice tests included; Reddit and LSAT communities universally recommend LawHub for official question practice, which this course cannot replicate×11
- Very small enrolled community (187 students, 89 ratings) compared to leading platforms — limited social proof and no active peer forum×7
- Amazon reviewers of the underlying book flag that the Logical Reasoning sections are weaker than the Analytical Reasoning coverage and may leave LR-specific test-takers underserved×6
Real quotes from real users
“"Nova's LSAT Prep Course provides the equivalent of a 2-month, 50-hour course. The course analyzes and codifies basic principles: the contrapositive, the if-then, pivotal words… Armed with this knowledge, you will have the ability to greatly increase your score."”
“"Forget the other study guides on the market, this one and the released actual LSATs from LSAC are all you need."”
“"Nova's Master the LSAT is certainly not the cheapest one, but it's easily the best value."”
“"This one really worked — I was in despair over taking the LSAT after working through two other prep books, but Nova's approach finally made the logic click."”
“"The Logic Games section is very thorough — good and thorough distinctions between different types of games. After working through it I went from missing about 8 questions to missing at most 5."”
“"Avoid Kaplan like the plague. I spent months unlearning all their stuff."”
“"7Sage and LSAT Demon are both very good and reasonably priced — take the free trials to see which works best for you."”
“"The book veers off course in the Logical Reasoning section — it provides only general information that may work for those who naturally think like a lawyer, but if LR is your weak point you will need another resource."”
“"A good introduction to what you'll find on the LSAT, but certainly not a consummate preparation tool — for Logical Reasoning help, don't bother spending your money here because it would be a waste."”
“"I gained over 10 points with LSATMax — the classes, videos, and practice problems were all helpful and the instructors were accessible."”
Frequently asked questions
Ready to enrol?
You read the score, the pros, the cons and the quotes. If it's still a fit, here's the link.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. The score above was computed by AI before any commercial relationship was considered.
How we evaluated this
This review synthesizes 25 opinions collected across the public web. Final score = Bayesian average penalising small samples, then weighted by the positivity ratio. No paid placements, no hidden agenda.
- 17 from Blogs
- 5 from Forums
- 3 from Forums